As industry in all corners scrambles to position itself in readiness for a perceived retrofit bonanza provided by the Green Deal from Autumn 2012, and as we contemplate the impact of Government delaying the Energy Bill which drives it by 3 months, we thought it would be useful to sit back and really look at what is happening here.

What problems is the Green Deal trying to solve? Well, there is one key problem at its heart – that the interventions saving the most energy and CO2 emissions have long economic paybacks beyond their time in the house and householders do not have the upfront cash to pay for them. Full stop. It will achieve this by allowing a long term loan to be fixed to a property (not the owner) but in such a way that it ensures the total household outgoings (energy plus loan) will remain lower than the original energy bill.
Picture
The Calculation of Simple Economic Payback

Thereafter follow a wide range of secondary issues which the Government is seeking to address so that take-up of the finance packages is not hindered:

  • Accredited assessment procedures and assessors.
  • Lists of approved measures.
  • A quality control process for the approved installation army.
  • FSA approved loan scheme attached to the house not the owner/resident.
  • Insurance backed guarantees on certain measures.
So aside from the ‘loan’, the Green Deal is putting lots of building blocks together which instil quality processes into an industry which, frankly should be there already. This is great news of course and I will look at these in detail in later blogs.

Let’s address the core of this, that the key blockage to significant energy efficiency improvements is the long economic payback of those measures which give us the biggest savings i.e. that their cost of installation outweighs the relative annual benefit by say a factor of 10 or more.

1.       Years of offering free or heavily subsidised insulation measures with next-to-no payback and very disappointing take up. See page 110 of the Climate Change Committees latest budget report to underline this.

2.       As we proved 6 years ago with our Carshalton Grove demo house (link) it is the approach to the work which ensures that installed costs are minimised.

3.       Once the expected interest rates of 5 to 8% APR are added to the overall cost, we might expect the payback period of the Green Deal package to double. This may mean that we can only afford to go for those measures that will pay back quickly i.e. that the Green Deal will have missed its core aim.

Without being able to reduce the economic payback as low as possible through effective delivery, attractive interest rates and other incentives to pull customers in, there may be little take up of the measures. As we will go onto explain in a series of blogs, the concentration of effort in industry ought to be on offering the best possible economic payback by;
  • thoroughly analysing all appropriate options for the home, including lifestyle guidance, then;
  • creating a whole house plan such that each initiative has an energy saving benefit presented;
  • industry logistics become such that those measures identified in the whole house plan are tackled when the most appropriate situation arises e.g. underfloor insulation when a floor is lifted e.g. insulating the wall behind a boiler when the new boiler is installed e.g. a social housing void or a new house purchase becomes available to tackle all identified measures at once
So to that end, the most effective adviser to a homeowner will select the most appropriate financial mechanism to suit the content and the manner of the house upgrade. The ‘Green Deal’ may or may not be appropriate, and as such ought not be touted as the answer to all of our prayers. As such I would contend that the focus on the Green Deal financing is a Red Herring. All of the excellent work on appropriate advice and installer competency currently being developed is the real winning outcome here.

To follow:

Blog 2 - Economic Payback as the Core Green Deal Calculation

Blog 3 - The Measures to be Carried Out

Blog 4 - The Green Deal Advisor and Their Report

Blog 5 - The Accreditation of Installers

Blog 6 - The Green Deal as a Red Herring….

 


Comments

Caroline Newton
27/07/2011 00:54

Thanks for this analysis. It's useful and thought-provoking.

Reply
26/10/2011 22:33

Hi Russell
One thing they might consider adding to the green deal. People buying a solid wall house face the disruption of solid wall insulation (IWI)even with WHISCERS;ideally the work would be done before they move in, as is usually the case with rented houseing. If the govt. offered a one to two month bridging loan, either interest free, OR interest rolled up and added to the green deal loan, then people could hopefully stay up to 2 extra months in their old home while the work was done on their new one.

Reply
Dayo
17/05/2012 08:36

I think its a bit clearer when the Golden rule is met, but much of a Red Herring where a prospective beneficiary doesnt seem to be in a better position after the improvements.I still find it unclear how the ECO will work. I mean the brokerage system and its carbon trading element.To me, competition is limited to the energy companies and green deal providers with less focus on the beneficiaries. Can you please shed more light on this. Thanks

Reply
Dayo
17/05/2012 08:46

I find it unrealistic that tenants (not homeowners) can benefit from green deal. Most especially where it comes to packaging finance.I understand that it doesn't affect credit rating and no initial capital outlay, but who bears the burden of unsecured loan(finace) for a tenant with poor credit rating? Thanks

Reply
Ian
03/06/2012 22:48

I agree with your comments Russell. Asseesment of a client energy consumption, the recommendation of appropiate measures and skilled implimentation will be key to success. Marketing will also play a vital role and hopefully the government will do it's part in selling this so home owners are aware and are ready to be assessed. The payback period calculation will also be an important peice of information as this has also been one of the blockages to PV installations but at least with the green deal the money for PV would not have to be paid upfront.

Reply



Leave a Reply